QUALITY EVALUATION OF UIA ACADEMIC COOPERATION WITH PARTNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v7i01.307Keywords:
evaluation, cooperationAbstract
The aim of this cooperation is the evaluative research to know the level of effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of UIA cooperation with partners, so that the results can be used to repair either substance and the implementation of cooperation in the future. Evaluation methods using survey with samples as many as 65 people were taken simple random from a population of 168 target fixed lecturer in UIA TA 2017/2018. Data analysis using descriptive with SPSS program. The result of this research show that opinions of the fixed lecttures about the quality of cooperation with partners from both the domestic and overseas: highly optimum = 1.5%;, Optimum = 44.7%; moderate optimum = 36.9%; less than optimum = 15.54% and very less than optimum = 1.5%. The average opinion of the respondents = 3.23 score , that means the quality of collaboration with UIA partners shows quality of "moderate optimum"; and this needs to be improve.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
